Published by LeonBlog on 15 Aug 2009
The war on terrorism is a myth
Webster Tarpley, historian and journalist, U.S., working on forms of interference, particularly on the exploitation of the terrorist threat. He specialized in the study of false flag operations, ie operations commandos or terrorists who use false claims to induce a conflict situation. Webster Tarpley, historian and journalist, U.S. work on forms of interference, particularly on the exploitation of the terrorist threat. He specializes in the study of false flag operations, ie operations commandos or terrorists who use false claims to provoke a conflict situation. "You can understand the current policy of the United States if it underestimates the actual extent September 11. The attacks of 11 September have been a coup. The war against terrorism is based on a myth and from these events has become a state religion compulsory. The only way to fight the neocons is to destroy this myth. The opening of a truth commission like that of Russell-Sartre at the time of the Vietnam War, could help to destroy it. "One can not deny that Tarpley is an expert on geopolitics and his knowledge of the complex mechanisms of the current situation has naturally driven to seek advice on the situation. Questions were co-written by ReOpen911 and site GeoPolIntel who performed extensive analysis of shield ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile). Before going to the interview itself, Webster G. Tarpley, author of several books, including the extraordinary work of 9 / 11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, asked us to complete the interview with the following paragraph. "The main American-British project of the moment is the balkanize Pakistan, so that it can become an energy corridor for China, Iran and the Middle East, as we do with location of the port of Gwadar. The insane escalation of violence in Afghanistan, which bears the sign of Obama, has sense only if we understand that the purpose is to destroy the central government of Pakistan, causing the explosion of this country into five stages, according to the extension of the plan by Bernard Lewis. Pakistan is a much more important to Iran. There is even A British-American plan to destroy the chain of pro-Chinese countries along the Indian Ocean. But the Sri Lankan army has evacuated the terror (supported by the United States and the United Kingdom) terrorists who had their headquarters in London and known as the Tamil Tigers. It was really grotesque and see Milliband Kouchner (French Foreign Minister and British) try desperately to save the LTTE, the butchers that they could fight again! places like Zimbabwe, Sudan, Thailand, Cambodia, Bangladesh and several island groups, are now a battleground between China (the latter is pressure for trade and peaceful development), and the alliance the United States and Britain that seeks to ruin and to keep the discredited Washington Consensus against the consent of Beijing, which rejects the imperialist bullying type IMF-World Bank-WTO. ReOpen911: Obama's letter to Medvedev in which ask the Russians to negotiate the surrender of a nuclear Iran would not be a means to stir up another war in the Middle East? Webster G. Tarpley: As I wrote in Obama, The Postmodern Coup, Obama is the general policy of the administration of stoking the conflict between Iran and Russia. They call it the game of hot potato - bring an enemy state against another, hoping that both are damaged or destroyed during the process. The scheme would Obama push Russia in a position of hostility towards Iran by playing on fear of Russia in the end of what Iran might do with nuclear weapons if they had some. With people like Putin and Lavrov, the Russians are not ready to fall into a trap like that. The recent experience of the riots and mobilization in Iran has encouraged people from the CIA, a color revolution, a velvet revolution that does not seem particularly successful. If an Anglo-American puppet, seized power in Iran, one of the first things that would have cut the supply of oil to China, given that these days, that's where lies the greater interest of the United States and Great Britain the Middle East. Obama's speech in Cairo is nothing but an attempt to use the Arab-Islamic Middle East against Russia and China. Also India is a leading candidate to become the second Eurasian weapon of the United States and United Kingdom, but even here, the Indians may be too smart to fall into the trap. Everyone knows that the U.S. Congress has adopted laws applicants who apply for a regime change in Iran, with funding of $ 400 million, and five years and more, Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker has described the active role of intelligence teams and destabilization American in Iran, trying to foment rebellion with the Arabs, Azeris, Kurds, the Baloutches, Pashtuns and others, with the ultimate aim to divide and balkanize Iran, in the same way we were Yugoslavia, Iraq, and how it could be soon the Sudan. The color of the revolution in Iran is largely the work of the "soft power" (Translator's note: supporting a foreign policy of "low intensity") inspired by the writings of Joseph Nye, and that includes the circle of Brzezinski at the Rand Corporation as well as the International Crisis Group and other operators to achieve their goals using the left as cover, slogans humanitarian, human rights. If I understand Jacques Sapir, he seems to say that humanitarian slogans were so downtrodden by the Western imperialists to serve their own purposes predators, these slogans have been completely discredited because of the hypocrisy and the effect of "two weights, two measures ". If these are precisely the intentions of Sapir, are fully justified. I would say it is time to emphasize the economic rights of developing countries, beginning with industrialization, full employment and eliminating poverty, disease, l 'illiteracy, and a situation where we see a billion people starving or at risk of famine, according to a UN report, and perhaps 2 billion people reduced to a miserable existence, with less than a dollar a day . These are the real questions facing mankind today. ReOpen911: The Gates-Brzezinski Plan provides a new approach with Iran. If the plan does not work, the United States could attack Iran with nuclear weapons, Schneider said as JR? Webster G. Tarpley: The whole basis of the scheme of Obama among the American imperialist circles, it is increasingly conscious of the fact that the United States are too weak, too hated, too bankrupt to undertake new adventures in hours Middle East.'s why you take them back shifted the responsibility to others, making war with the use of agents or puppets suicide bombers, as happened with Ethiopia against Somalia used a few years ago. ReOpen911: If the United States and Russia fails in an attempt to take Iran to end its nuclear program, Israel may strike as strike Iraq of Saddam Hussein? Webster G. Tarpley: Following Gates, Panetta, Biden and Obama himself have ordered Israel to let lose, to leave alone any idea of attacking Iran, which would have separated from their allies. I mention this in his book Obama: The Unauthorized Biography. I think the English are on the same line. Senator Kerry and Obama have also said Iran is entitled to a peaceful nuclear program. All of this reinforces the idea that the United States would want to make a puppet of Iran suicide bombers against Russia and / or China. Those who ignore this trend continues to live in the world com 'was before December 2007, when the assessments of U.S. intelligence official said that there was no Iranian nuclear weapons program. I doubt that the Israelis initiate such an attack. If they did, it would be a catastrophe world. Our friends at the Quai d'Orsay (French Foreign Ministry, NDT) should do everything possible to dissuade Netanyahu & co. ReOpen911: As the U.S. Secret Service have said that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program Since 2003, we have to accept a nuclear Iran with a civilian? Webster G. Tarpley: Yes, despite the demagoguery bellicistica by Sarkozy and Kouchner on this when they tried to go to the front. Every country has an inalienable right to science, technology , industry and production of modern energy, and in today's world, this can only mean the peaceful exploitation of nuclear energy. This was the basis of American foreign policy during most of the Cold War, the initiative " Atoms for Peace "of Eisenhower. All countries in the world who want to assert their sovereignty and the right to development seriously consider examining an important application of nuclear energy, beginning with China, India, Russia, Jordan and many others. In this sequel to the successful French example, far more eloquent speeches of Sarkozy. After the massive violations of the nonproliferation regime, sealed by the U.S. and India on nuclear power, the United States have no scruples when it comes to harass or intimidate others on this. ReOpen911: The backbone of American foreign policy in Europe is the ABM Treaty and the enlargement of NATO. What do you think of this provocation to Russia and the risk for addressing European allies? Webster G. Tarpley: At best, the enlargement of NATO is useless and very dangerous in most likely scenarios. What sensible person would commit itself to fight and die for a madman like Saakashvili, after he showed his mental instability with the suicide attack against Russia in August 2008? What sensible person would want to be involved in the latest adventure of these kleptocrats IMF in Kiev? When East Germany, he returned to West Germany, the United States have taken seriously the commitments with Russia: NATO forces would not have entered in the former East Germany. Now, I go much more distant. It's time to reverse this trend. Calls on France to reconsider the idea of restoring the command structure of NATO. Taking account of America's aggressive and unstable regimes not far from Russia, France is in danger of being dragged into a catastrophic war in the wake Anglo-American. This is not the future of a great nation like France. We can also see a second series of provocative countries made from Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Ukraine and other countries that may be thrown in the fight against Russia over issues like the termination of the distribution of natural gas in Western Europe almost every winter. ReOpen911: Regarding the ABM Treaty, what do you think the installation of missile defense in Eastern European countries like the Czech Republic, without prior agreement with the European Parliament? See http://fr.rian.ru/world/20081110/118227844.html G. Webster Tarpley: I called several times in public that Obama took specific commitments if it wants to prove that you are truly the angel of peace who claims to be. The first is to announce that there will be no deployment of ABM systems in Poland, since they can be easily implemented in a strategic pre-emptive nuclear first strike against Russia, so the world thrown explosives in the context of the old Cold War. Obama could simply announce: "The missile crisis Poland does not happen." The other commitment that Obama could take would be to withdraw all U.S. support of NATO enlargement. It's what any European with a little 'common sense require him to do. Instead, last summer we had 200,000 fans duped by Obama at the Brandenburg Gate. ReOpen911 In this context, what do you think of the integration of France to NATO and its participation in the war against terrorism? Webster G. Tarpley: I would recommend to France not to submit to NATO command. President de Gaulle was right when he completely expelled from Versailles headquarters of NATO and withdrew France from NATO's command structure. This has clouded the relations ex - American, but it prevented the anarchist elements in the organization causing serious problems for France. Especially I think of General Lyman Lemnitzer, a supporter of the transaction Nothwood (NDT: plan devised by senior executives of the Department of Defense for the purpose of suggestion American public opinion and lead it well to support a U.S. military attack against the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro) when he was president of the Pentagon and was about to become the Commander of NATO, and he did everything to install Gladio in Italy and in most part of the NATO countries (NDT: paramilitary organization of the Second World War, linked to Western intelligence services launched by NATO to counter a possible Soviet invasion of Western Europe). In short, De Gaulle was right, the West needs that France maintain their intellectual independence and ability to develop a responsible and realistic critique of the excesses of the Anglo-Americans. What did De Gaulle, is what is expected of the future leaders of France. ReOpen911: On September 11, thinks that may be born of an independent inquiry? And if so, is the will of the American courts or international action such as "Politics for 9 / 11 Truth" (Translator's note: the political leaders to the truth September 11) G. Webster Tarpley: The importance of movement for the truth about September 11th, developed in American society between 2006 and 2007, has been largely disintegrated to become impotent. While the primary campaign began to gather energy in 2007, many old Activists of 9 / 11 have made the great mistake of sacrificing its business to professional politicians who had promised to do something to investigate the matter. Dennis Kucinich, candidate of the Liberal Democratic Party to the left, he promised publicly that it would investigate sull'11 / 9, as well as on the deal of the B-52 "rogue" (Translator's note: long-range strategic bomber manufactured by Boeing) occurred between August and September 2007, shortly after a group of activists I was part of the issued 'warning of Kennebunkport, with whom we have said that Cheney was making a last attempt to start the war against Iran. This happened when the Israelis launched the air strike against Syria. But Kucinich did not keep his promise. An even larger 's 9 / 11 Truth Movement was swallowed by Ron Paul, Congressman of Texas and candidate for the libertarian Republican. He made no promises in public like Kucinich, but privately said the activists of 9 / 11 Truth Movement who shared their point of view and said publicly that he would in due course. With these certainties, many activists gave their time, money and support to the presidential campaign of Ron Paul. But when, during a national debate on cable television that was present throughout the national press, Ron Paul was asked, he stated emphatically that thought absurd ideas of 9 / 11 Truth Movement and that they embarrassed him, he added that the activists should abandon their efforts. He also said that his skepticism about the relationship of 11 September was equal to his skepticism for government documents, neither more nor less. In the end, when it became clear that Obama had a real chance of becoming president, the rest of the liberal left-wing activism resigned and joined the messianic and utopian quête proposed by Obama. Consequently, the peace movement, the movement for the dismissal (NDT, and the process of Bush) and the 9 / 11 Truth Movement were literally swept away. All this shows the important role played by Obama in the suppression of the protests and the protection of the establishment of Wall Street against the popular agitation. Now it would take the decisive involvement of one or more world leaders outside the United States to carry out the necessary investigation by the Independent International Commission on 9 / 11 truth. ReOpen911: Many people have discovered the geopolitical conflicts and the background trying to learn more about the attacks of 11 September 2001. What would you say to those people who discover, often with horror, that a good number of wars and attacks are made by the United States and / or interest groups against the interests of the people? Webster G. Tarpley: The problem of U.S. foreign policy is not essentially within the federal government, but comes from the fact that the U.S. foreign policy is largely produced by powerful banking interests of Wall Street, which operates through bodies like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group and the insidious Mont Pelerin Society that deals with economics. Obama, Biden, Holbrook, and many others are the servants of these bankers on Wall Street. These forces do not follow a policy that would require nationwide, for instance, good relations between the United States and Russia, as they were kept during the American Revolution when the American Civil War and during the administration of FD Roosevelt. Instead of an American national politics, we have a policy favorable to the financiers and the imperialists. It's the same mentality of the City of London and part of the European Commission and the Central Bank. We live in an era of oligarchic dominance over the globe. The only way to change this situation is to increase the politicization and activism of a part of modern society that is usually limited to a passive stupor, apathy, alienation through to popular culture. ReOpen911: Internet plays an important role in providing the information and then to what we might call an 'education of the masses "according to her, concerted action to result in a complaint on this network is on the agenda? Webster G. Tarpley: One of the positive aspects of the U.S. system was the strong protection of freedom of expression embodied by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. You can compare it with the terrible situation of a country like Great Britain. Liberals totalitarian regime of Obama are hostile to the continuation of the tradition of freedom of expression. They want to reduce the scope of freedom of expression using the pretext of legislation intended to outlaw the crime is not criminal acts, but the views held by those who have committed such criminal acts -- outlaw is an idea rather strange opinions in law. The Democratic Party also seems to want to silence or intimidate the right wing or reactionary radio's most prominent commentators in the country, and representing a major force who criticize the regime Obama . On the pretext of forcing the speakers who use the public view, the latter attempted to offer a wide variety of political opinions, or to represent local community groups. It would be better to prohibit a corporation, the total possession of mass media in a given town and just leave the conversation evolve. ReOpen911: You who are often pessimistic about the future (just think of her latest book in which he explains why feeding little hope in Obama) has any hope for a more peaceful future? Webster G. Terpley: Do not believe the demagoguery of Obama as a puppet of Wall Street does not make me a pessimist but a realist. Obama has passed its heyday, is now on the descent, although the threat of new false flag operations aimed at Russia, China, Sudan, Pakistan and other new targets would undoubtedly at this time. Having studied Plato, Leibniz and Machiavelli, I am optimistic as regards the prospects for action in this world. On these points are in against Leibniz and Voltaire. also approve what it says on the essential point Dante's Divine Comedy in Canto Marco Lombardo, where the emphasis is placed on the fact that the state of the world depends on God, the predestination or bad luck, but that It is rather a task given to human beings who must exercise their free will. People have to understand that historical action is more feasible in this world than at any other time in history, it's time to take advantage of these opportunities before the door of opportunity closes, which can happen at any time. ReOpen911: She who knows the cogs of the Machiavelli of our time, what can our readers and citizens to help the world to be better and more peaceful ? Webster G. Tarpley: There is no reason to suffer a global economic depression or a world war that could follow the same sequence of events we have experienced in the 1930s. First, the laws of economics are not a mystery . I explain in my latest book Surviving the Cataclysm (Surviving the Cataclysm). To escape from the depression first and foremost we must do whatever is necessary to reduce the burden of fictitious capital and revenue speculative world economy. This means doing things like prohibit the derivatives bubble of 1.5 trillion dollars, or tax their derivatives until their disappearance, prohibit loans rate mortgage aggistabile, outlaw "hedge funds" highly speculative (hedge funds), to halt foreclosures of homes, farms, factories, taxing the speculators with the Tobin tax of 1%, readjust the petroleum markets, seize and close down banks that dominate zombie bankrupted Wall Street and the City of London. We must seize the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, central banks controlled by private and nationalized. They should start by doing the 0% loans for productive activities, ie creation of physical goods tangible form of industry, agriculture, construction, transport, construction, mining, scientific research, medical equipment and other preliminaries of human existence. All this is especially necessary here in the United States, because the whole economy is approaching the point of physical collapse and thermodynamics. In this country we should build a thousand hospitals, a hundred high-temperature nuclear reactors of the fourth generation, to build 170,000 kilometers of rails Maglev (NDT: Magnetic levitation train), rebuild the interstate highway system, and rebuild all the infrastructure of water and purification. We need a convincing program in high energy physics to solve the current problems of thermonuclear fusion energy. We need a persuasive program in biomedical research to find remedies for diseases that afflict mankind. These efforts, which by definition should be international. Of course, we must fund and restore the social safety net which will be critical for victims of depression in the next two or three years. And finally, we need a new world monetary conference to create a livable world monetary system to restart global trade and promote the economic and technological development of Africa, South Asia, most countries of Latin America, Eastern Europe and other areas where economic development has been impeded. We must take an interest in large infrastructure projects worldwide as the Maglev in Dakar to Dubai, the Maglev from Cap Town to Cairo, bridges and tunnels along the Mediterranean to Gibraltar and between Sicily and Tunisia, a Eurasian Maglev system, a bridge - Bering Strait tunnel, a new Channel Thai (NDT: the Isthmus of Kra in Malaysia), a "Tennessee Valley Authority" to the Ganges, Brahmaputra, Mekong, the Amazon and other river systems in the world (NDT: Tennessee Valley Authority: American company in charge of navigation, flood control, electricity generation and economic development of the Tennessee Valley), and the development of river transport in Africa with a system of locks and canals between the upper Nile and the high Congo. We should do all this with full awareness that unless we realize these progressive steps necessary while we live, the world civilization would sink into a period of chaos and horror at the moment it is difficult to conceive, but should be sufficiently clear. litany My favorite is that of a Spanish miner in a region of northern Spain, Asturias, who said that his personal credo was: "Your choice in the modern world is clear. Be active before becoming radioactive. Then Choose. This alternative has not changed much. My hope is that more and more people choose to be active.
Sto aspettando pazientemente che i dati del delirio arrivino alla luce, ma sono davvero curioso. Sono curioso perche' i numeri della finanza nell'ultimo anno non hanno alcun senso. Perche' i casi sono due: o sono stati forniti dei dati palesemente falsi sull'entita' della “botta” (ma non credo) oppure stanno venendo forniti dati palesemente falsi sulla cosiddetta ripresa. Vediamo di riassumere un minimo in senso cronologico. Proviamo a sintetizzare la storia che dovremmo berci, cioe' la storia dell'ultimo anno: * Crollo di Lehman Brothers, esplosione del panico nelle borse, crisi dei subprime produce danni enormi, numeri alla mano si tratta di 14.000 miliardi di dollari persi solo nella borsa di New York. * La crisi procede, e falcia brutalmente i tre grandi colossi dell'auto americana, gia' in crisi da tempo. * Si parla di meltdown, e il Dow Jones raggiunge l'indice che serve ad iniziare il processo. * Si inizia a parlare di riformare le regole, e si inizia con un summit nel quale si decide che si decidera'. * Nel frattempo, il valore delle case negli USA rasenta quello del 1963. * Il governo USA deve intervenire con un piano da 750 miliardi di dollari, il TARP, per salvare alcune istituzioni.Non saranno spesi che per il 30%. * Si fa un altro summit, nel quale si decide quando si decidera'. * Viene condannato a 150 anni un piccolo truffatore, che ha truffato 50 miliardi di dollari, una goccia nell'oceano dei 14.000 miliardi di perdite. * Il governo inglese deve intervenire con piu' di 300 miliardi di sterline, al punto da far declassare il debito pubblico. * Le stime europee sono quelle di un continente che perde dal 5% quando va bene, sino all' 11% quando va male. * Si celebra un inutile G8, dal quale esce una dichiarazione che dice “faremo i bravi e Babbo Natale ci portera' i regali”, o poco piu'. Nessuna reale azione viene intrapresa. * Si vedono segni di ripresa. * Si vedono vermi, Usul, come nemmeno Dio ne aveva mai visti. * Si intravvedono altri segni di ripresa. * Obama dichiara che la crisi e' finita. Diverse finanziarie americane dichiarano che restituiranno il TARP. * GS annuncia di essere in utile, anche se di poco.Ford ha i conti a posto. GM prevede di averli tra pochi mesi.Fiat continua a guadagnare mercato. * Riprende il consumo di petrolio, ei futures iniziano a salire , crescono gli investimenti nell'edilizia americana. * Signor Scott, energia. Ora, le ipotesi sono due: poiche' recuperare 14.000 miliardi di perdite e' semplicemente impossibile in un anno, e l'entita' completa del danno era ben superiore, si possono pensare diverse cose: * La prima e' che l'entita' della crisi fosse sovrastimata. E' assai improbabile. E' assai improbabile perche' tutti abbiamo visto gli effetti, i nuovi disoccupati esistono, le aziende chiudono. E' improbabile assai che si sia potuta falsificare l'intensita' di questa crisi, anche se il fenomeno del back to market permettera' di riassorbirla nel lungo termine. Ipotizzare che qualcuno abbia finto un disastro richiede, vista l'entita' delle perdite, richiede di tirare in ballo almeno i rettiliani.(1) * La seconda cosa che si puo' pensare e' che si stiano sovrastimando molto gli effetti di uesta “ripresa”. Probabilmente in parte e' vero, perche' siamo nel bel mezzo di una grossa speculazione finanziaria sulle materie prime, petrolio in primis. Tuttavia, e' interessante notare come anche in Italia si vedano gli effetti di questa “ripresa”, anche se il mercato impieghera' ancora tutta l'estate per ristrutturarsi. Interessante come Tremonti voglia liberarsi di parte della riserva aurea italiana, facendo venire i sudori freddi a tutti gli investitori in titoli. Un gioco pericoloso, che si puo' fare soltanto se si ha qualche freccia all'arco.(2) * La terza ipotesi, che mi sembra piu' probabile, e' che insieme a qualche scampolo delle prime due (la necessita' propagandistica di sostenere il nulla de facto delle riforme governative alla finanza attribuendogli il potere di funzionare solo perche' se ne parla, e un certo panico di borsa anche laddove non c'era ragione) e' semplicemente che la crisi sia stata semplicemente un “assestamento” da un mondo finanziariamente unipolare ad uno multipolare. Il motivo per il quale dico questo e' che durante questa crisi abbiamo assistito, per la prima volta , ad un fenomeno interessantissimo: sebbene vi siano state perdite anche ad Oriente , e sebbene il Giappone continui a mantenere lo stato di “malato terminale”(3), non c'e' stata correlazione tra lo svolgersi della crisi ad occidente e quella nell'area orientale. Si e' verificato il “detach”, il che significa che l'oriente ormai corre con le proprie gambe, e risente poco di crolli consistenti dell'economia occidentale. Ovviamente, la nascita di un'area economicamente autonoma produce un cambiamento degli equilibri, e non c'e' dubbio che quella che prima era la riserva di caccia delle borse anglosassoni, sia diventata territorio di caccia di cacciatori locali, i quali difendono piuttosto bene il proprio spazio. Se una volta le scorribande miliardarie dei raider europei in oriente(4) riempivano i nostri giornali, oggi a Londra e New Yori devono bussare e chiedere il permesso per mettere piede nel territorio altrui. Poiche' ogni nuovo equilibrio richiede un ridimensionamento delle vecchie forze dominanti, e' abbastanza spontaneo pensare che in realta' questa crisi sia una conseguenza dell'avvenuta indipendenza di alcuni mercati orientali rispetto alla finanza anglosassone. E cioe' a cedere sia stato il pezzo piu' debole della catena (il mercato dei prestiti immobiliari) ma la tensione sia stata provocata dal progressivo affievolirsi dei ritorni economici , dei flussi che prima consentivano alle istituzioni occidentali di vendere tonnellate di merda e farci dei soldi. Ovviamente, per una simile analisi occorrera' che gli storici ne parlino, e quindi occorrera' che qualcuno tra un paio di secoli di giri indietro e ci mostri i fatti in prospettiva. Il motivo per il quale propendo per questa impressione e' che per giustificare il delta tra la situazione di 12 mesi fa e quella odierna occorre un fattore pesante 10 triliardi di dollari. Se i danni effettivamente compensati dagli interventi governativi ammontano, sinora, a circa 4000 miliardi, perche' ci sono segni di ripresa mentre dovremmo essere ancora ben lungi dal vedere la fine del tunnel? L'unica ipotesi che mi sento di fare e' che il “detach” dell'economia dell'area cinese sia “costata” in termini di mancati profitti, una cifra simile. L'idea e' che buona parte di questa merda vensise giocata sulle borse orientali, e che fosse su quei mercati che avvenivano le speculazioni piu' grosse, o che perlomeno quello fosse il “dumping” ove finivano i titoli piu' tossici: una volta arrivati i cacciatori locali, e una volta che l'attenzione dei locali si e' rivolta all'economia locale anziche' ai soliti padroni del salvadenanio, gli investitori occidentali non sono piu' riusciti a vendere la loro merda subprime , e il rischio sia esploso nelle loro mani. Insomma, se togliamo dal controllo occidentale un'area simile, che diviene finanziariamente autonoma, chi prima faceva guadagni enormi in quelle aree smette di farlo. Questa ipotesi spiegherebbe diversi fenomeni: 1. L'industria si sta riprendendo , sembra , ancora piu' velocemente di quanto avessi predetto. Che Ford dichiarasse un buon bilancio non me lo aspettavo. Che FIAT crescesse cosi' sul mercato a scapito dei tedeschi nemmeno. Che le PMI riuscissero a trovare sollievo(5) e che resistessero cosi' tanto , nemmeno. La crisi del credito li ha ridotti in ginocchio, ma hanno superato giugno, e quindi il momento piu' buio. Se questo succede e' perche' la crisi non era cosi' impattante sul piano strutturale. DOVE, quindi, si e' sfogata la crisi? Non c'e' traccia dei 10 triliardi di dollari di perdite nelle perdite -sebbene rilevanti- dell'industria in se'. 